Saturday, March 22, 2008

Krauthammer on Obama

Charles Krauthammer is a monster. He is, however, a frequently insightful monster. Though any neocon critique of Obama, or anyone else for that matter, is suspect, Kruthammer's summary of the main thrust of Obama's speech is on the money:

The question is why didn't he leave that church? Why didn't he leave -- why doesn't he leave even today -- a pastor who thundered not once but three times from the pulpit (on a DVD the church proudly sells) "God damn America"? Obama's 5,000-word speech, fawned over as a great meditation on race, is little more than an elegantly crafted, brilliantly sophistic justification of that scandalous dereliction.

His defense rests on two central propositions: (a) moral equivalence, and (b) white guilt.

This contextual analysis of Wright's venom, this extenuation of black hate speech as a product of white racism, is not new. It's the Jesse Jackson politics of racial grievance, expressed in Ivy League diction and Harvard Law nuance. That's why the speech made so many liberal commentators swoon: It bathed them in racial guilt, while flattering their intellectual pretensions. An unbeatable combination.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home