Tuesday, September 26, 2006

It's Too Nice Outside for Me to be Sitting Here

You gotta love Tom Fleming: "We are nation of unreflective gluttons and buyers, eating our way into an early grave, but to combine such swinish hedonism with a pharisaic self-righteousness makes us doubly disgusting. We’re hardly better than the violence-crazed Muslims who are killing Christians because the Pope made an historical allusion their mullahs are too stupid to comprehend. Don’t laugh at the 'ragheads' my friends. Our own people are no better, only more cowardly."

Here is a sad story of local import. The pastor of Little Flock Baptist Church in Bullitt County, Kentucky recently stepped down. It turns out that he was day-trading with church money. Check out the picture with all the PCs that have stock info.

As I've said over and over and over and over and over and over again, intervention in the Middle East has not and will not make our nation safer. Now comes news that the latest National Intelligence Estimate "asserts that Islamic radicalism, rather than being in retreat, has metastasized and spread across the globe."

An interesting review of "What Terrorists Want: Understanding the Enemy, Containing the Threat," by Louise Richardson. "Richardson has two main critiques of Bush's antiterrorism policies. The first is now accepted by virtually everyone who is not invested in Bush's war: We should never have attacked Iraq because it had nothing to do with international terrorism. By doing so, we squandered international support, stirred up Muslim and Arab rage, and made the terrorism threat far worse. Her second point is more controversial because it directly challenges the Bush administration's Manichaean, good-vs.-evil response to terrorism: The entire 'war on terror' was a mistake. 'Our objective should not be the completely unattainable goal of obliterating terrorism; rather, we should pursue the more modest and attainable goal of containing terrorism recruitment and constraining resort to the tactic of terrorism.'"

More defeatist rhetoric from liberal pansies who obviously hate George Bush, America, and probably Jesus. This time, the haters are shedding light on problems in Afghanistan. Here is a blurb from Newsweek:

Ridge by ridge and valley by valley, the religious zealots who harbored Osama bin Laden before 9/11—and who suffered devastating losses in the U.S. invasion that began five years ago next week—are surging back into the country's center. In the countryside over the past year Taliban guerrillas have filled a power vacuum that had been created by the relatively light NATO and U.S. military footprint of some 40,000 soldiers, and by the weakness of Afghan President Hamid Karzai's administration...But the harsh truth is that five years after the U.S. invasion on Oct. 7, 2001, most of the good news is confined to Kabul, with its choking rush-hour traffic jams, a construction boom and a handful of air-conditioned shopping malls. Much of the rest of Afghanistan appears to be failing again. Most worrisome, a new failed-state sanctuary is emerging across thousands of square miles along the Afghan-Pakistan border: "Jihadistan," it could be called. It's an autonomous quasi state of religious radicals, mostly belonging to Pashtun tribes who don't recognize the Afghan-Pakistan frontier—an arbitrary line drawn by the British colonialists in 1893.


Of course, this was all predicted by Michael Scheuer in his 2004 book "Imperial Hubris." Here is an excerpt:

I believe the war in Afghanistan was necessary, but is being lost because of our hubris. Those who failed to bring peace to Afghanistan after 1992 are now repeating their failure by scripting government affairs and constitution-making in Kabul to portray the birth of Western-style democracy, religious tolerance, and women's rights -- all anathema to Afghan political and tribal culture and none of which has more than a small, unarmed constituency. We are succeeding only in fooling ourselves. Certain the Afghans want to be like us, and abstaining from effective military action against growing numbers of anti-U.S. insurgents, we have allowed the Taliban and al Qaeda to regroup and refit. They are now waging an insurgency that gradually will increase in intensity, lethality, and popular support, and ultimately force Washington to massively escalate its military presence or evacuate. In reality, neither we nor our Karzai-led surrogates have built anything political or economic that will long outlast the withdrawal of U.S. and NATO forces. Due to our hubris, what we today identify and promote as a nascent Afghan democracy is a self-made illusion on life-support; it is a Western-imposed regime that will be swept away if America and its allies stop propping it up with their bayonets.

1 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Here is a sad story of local import.

Perhaps the story would not be quite so sad if he'd turned a profit.

5:49 AM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home